Who Am I?     My Books, Stories, Etc.     Drop Me a Line

Just a place to catch up on stuff , see what’s happening, read my rambles. Welcome!  Stay in Touch!

Kennie JD: One of the Best Things About YouTube

Kennie JD, YouTube

YouTube has become too huge to truly comprehend, and most of the ‘tubers that built their base from YT have either moved on, retreated, or sunk into scandal. But once in a while you stumble overcome with long-form content that is charming and insightful about its unabashed affection for crap — bad movies, reality TV, straight-to-streaming disasters. So what’s not to love about Kennie J.D.

Kennie’s in her late twenties – just had a birthday, in fact — Happy Birthday, Kennie JD! — and she’s wry and funny and extremely smart. She started by doing, of all things, make-up tutorials with commentary – an interesting choice for a good-sized color from Detroit. But they caught on. And she was just getting started. Kennie’s a songwriter and musician as well – you can hear her work on YouTube, and on Spotify – but I caught up after all that was well underway — more than a year ago through just one of her channels, her Saturday show, Bad Movies and a Beat, where she watches a really awful movie – the kinds I love the most, of course – and then makes a ten or twenty or even thirty-minute video about it, laughin’ and swearin’ and carryin’ on through a blow-by-blow recap and analysis – and surprising, sophisticated and thoughtful analyses. It’s enough to make you want to come back every week. Hey, her take on Saltburn alone was worth looking at, and she’s in there pitching almost every Saturday.

These days she has a lot of channels and she’d doing a lot of stuff In fact she’s co-hosting a new entertainment interview podcast as well, Connect the Dots, with music executive Shawn Pecas Costner. Anyway: the easiest way to learn about her is just to search out her channel on YouTube – that’s Kennie with an IE, and J.D. as in Jane Darcy – no, that’s not her name, I have no idea what her name is. If you like bold, brassy, big laughers with something to say and almost no filter at all, you’ll enjoy her, in at least one – or more! — of her many incarnations.. Kennie J.D. In fact, it bein’ Friday and all, she’ll probably have something new up on her feed tomorrow, so .. .check it out.

 

This Wretched Valley: survival horror with great promise … and something missing

This Wretched ValleyI just finished Jenny Kiefer’s This Wretched Valley, by first-time novelist Jenny Kiefer … and I almost liked it. But there was something missing… and I wonder if anyone else felt it, too.

You remember the podcast, Talking Scared, that I reviewed a while back? They had Jennie Kiefer on as a guest recently, and I was really intrigued by her story – and her, she’s smart and worked hard to get this right. But I was especially interested because This Wretched Valley is a novel of ‘survival horror,’ which is a kind of subgenre of horror in general: when people get caught in a horrible ‘natural’ disaster, where some horrific element is introduced, or maybe simply madness, and evil – supernatural or psychotic – intervene. Dan Simmons’ The Terror, based on the historical event of two sailing ships frozen in the ice during a really stupid attempt at finding Northwest Passage, and Alma Katsu’s The Hunger, a horrific re-telling of the Donner Party, Nick Cutter’s The Troop, about a Boy Scout camping trip that goes terribly, cannibalistically wrong, Gregoire Courtois’ The Laws of the Skies, which does horrible things to an entirely different group of young campers, are all great examples. In fact, Stephen King even got into the game with The Girl Who Loves Tom Gordon, about a girl lost in the forest and maybe pursued by a monstrous bear… thing. And probably the best known – and one that was mentioned in the interview with Jenny Kiefer’s interview, is Scott Smith’s The Ruins, which was made into a pretty damn good movie way back in 2008 – about a tumble of ancient, overgrown buildings in the jungle that literally eat up some unsuspecting hikers.

And yeah, This Wretched Valley bears a superficial resemblance to The Ruins. This time it’s a huge shelf of rock in the middle of the Kentucky Wilderness and a small group of rock climbers who want to be the first to conquer it that are… well, consumed? Haunted? Eaten? By a clearly malevolent nature with an especially bloody history.

Now I liked the Ruins. Even Stephen King called it the best horror novel of the new century – though hey, admittedly, the century was only a couple of years old at that point. The gradual desperation and madness of the characters was just … hypnotic – and it’s way more brutal in the printed form than the movie. And I was hoping for much the same in Wretched Valley.

But… it falls a little flat. Kiefer’s writing style is very good, very polished. Her action sequences, her imagery, her attention to detail – this is the kind of thing you look for in a book, right? But as much as I wanted it, the story just never grabbed me, never convinced me, and ultimately the problems I found in the logic of its backstory, the reason for all this horror, just didn’t convince me or affect me.

And I’m really sorry.

So… here’s the puzzle? Why didn’t it work? It’s a good idea. It’s a strong, if small, subgenre that really can grab you by the nads =– all the books I mention managed it. And I went through a similar ‘reality meets the monstrous” in my recent there-book set, The Rain Triptych, where it was creatures coming out of the rain to murder completely normal people in the must awful ways. So I get it. I want it.

So why didn’t it work?

I’m thinking… it was the characters. I think the real horror, the real emotion that survival horror affords you isn’t from – or at least not only from – the imagery or the tension. I think you have to believe in these people, you have to think you know them. Not like them or ‘identify’ with them – stupid term, almost never applicable – but you have to have enough details and background, even if it’s offered only in dribs and drabs, even if it’s as much from dialogue or dreams as it is from info-dump narration – actually, not info-dump narration, thank you. Because if the people that all this horrendous stuf is happening to aren’t real … then all that horrendous stuff doesn’t matter.

And that’s what I couldn’t find in This Wretched Valley. Two of the main characters were supposed to be boyfriend and girlfriend. They were supposed to love each other. But I don’t recall any scenes, especially pre-horror, that really made us feel that connection. One of the characters was absolutely focused, even obsessed, with being a famous climber. An internet influencer. But we never got a sense of why this was so important to her, who drove her to do some of the truly crazy stuff she did. One of the climbers was truly dedicated to his dog, who seemed to fall victim to the wild evil of the woods first… and look, I’m a huge dog person, there’s a Staffordshire doing at my feet right now. But what made this guy so focused on, so obsessed with his dog, to the point that he was more important than the other humans or the money or … well, anything else?

That was the problem for me. The characters that I was supposed to care about – that I had to care about – were shallow little bowls, when what I needed were deep wells… especially if I was going to follow them all the way into the dark woods and see them fall, one by one… and feel terrified WITH them.

So .. what you you guys think? If any of you have read This Wretched Valley or listened to the audiobook –which isn’t bad! — Drop me a note and tell me if it worked for you… and if it didn’t, why you think it didn’t?

Meanwhile, I’ll tell you this much: I really am looking for to what Ljenny Kiefer does next. She’s got real talent, and good stories to tell. But this one … but didn’t work for me

Links to all the versions, as well as a bunch of other survival horror – including mine! — in the show notes. Dive on in. Let me know what you think.

Henry Thomas and the sequel to E.T. (no, really)

E.T. Henry ThomasHere, come on down the rabbit hole with me. I went looking for some background on Henry Thomas for a review of The Fall of the House of Usher… and found an entirely different little gem: a very short, very special sequel to E.T.: The Extraterrestrial, posing as an Xfinity commercial from four years ago.

Seriously.

Of course you know that Henry Thomas was Elliott in Stephen Spielberg’s sappy and still wonderful classic fantasy film E.T. It’s hard to imagine that it hit theaters for the first time more than forty years ago, and since it was made, Spielberg – quite rightly – has resisted the constant pressure to do a sequel of some kind.

Except … he did Or at least he gave permission to somebody else to do it.

Back in 2020, when the world still made a little sense, the cable company called Xfinity actually made a Chrstimas ad that aired on Sky TV in the UK – I’m not sure it ever played here in America – that is a real, live sequel to the original film, with ET coming back to visit a full-grown Elliot and his own family. And it’s just … wonderful.

Click this link or just search it out on YouTube yourself, but either way: take a look. If you’re anything like me, you’ll weep a couple of happy tears, at how this tiny little short recaptures the movie from 1982 almost perfectly.

Truth be told, it never got made. There’s even a “making of” video on YouTube – here’s the link – and nobody was more surprised than Henry Thomas himself. He was amazed that Spielberg signed off on it – but he did. And Lance Acord – who’s been directing fancy commercials or the big boys for years, and who’s won BAFTA awards and so much more for his work as a cinematographer and director of photography – put together a team of actors and special effects folks who did just about everything right.

E.T. isn’t reduced to a squeegy little CGI character here. He – it – they? — were created by puppeteers, then enhanced with CGI, and it works perfectly. And it doesn’t stop there. The two kids who play Elliot’s children really do look like him. His wife, who doesn’t have a single spoken line, looks enough like Elliott’s own Mom from the original film to be a little spooky. And Henry Thomas as Eliot manages to be Eliot all grown up. He plays the whole new encounter perfectly. And on top of that, the filmmakers worked hard to put as many references from the original film into the short to make it even more fasciating. It just … works.

It’s a little late for Christmas, but if you want to get a tiny slice of the original sense of wonder that ET gave us 40-some years ago, go watch this thing, hiding in a corner of YouTube. I hope it makes you as unreasonably happy as it did me

Slightly older but no less fascinating posts

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.